The storm on Lake Michigan lasted only 15 minutes, but the conditions it put into motion took seven lives.
It was the Fourth of July in 2003, near Warren Dunes State Park along the Michigan coast. People left the water during the storm, but once it passed and the sun came out several hours later, they thought it was safe to swim. They went back into the water even though no lifeguards were present and red flags flew their warning colors over the beaches.
In one case, members of a religious group drove 80 miles from Chicago to the beach. Under clear skies, many hit the water immediately. Several men and young boys went out deep, although they stayed within the swimming area buoy markers. Then they felt the strong current carrying them away from shore.
News accounts at the time called the current a riptide and undertow, but scientists now know it was a rip current. Two boys, ages 12 and 15, were in distress and a group of older men swam out to help them. The men pulled the 12-year-old to shore but were unable to rescue the 15-year-old. Two of the rescuers were pulled away by the current.
The young boy survived, but the older boy and the two rescuers drowned. On other parts of that Lake Michigan shoreline during the same timespan, four other people drowned in separate incidents over the deadly holiday.
These incidents came under scrutiny recently by Wisconsin Sea Grant scientists who are studying a storm-induced wave called a meteotsunami—a contraction of the term meteorological tsunami, which means a wave caused by weather.
Their results were published on Feb. 14, 2019, in the journal Scientific Reports. The paper, “Unexpected rip currents induced by a meteotsunami,” details findings that the storm formed a moderate-height (less than 10 centimeters) meteotsunami, which is what went on to cause the unexpected rip currents.
Although these conditions may not be rare, this is the first time researchers have verified a meteotsunami-generated rip current—or meteo-rip, for short.
“No one in the world has ever documented this before,” says Chin Wu, a professor of civil and environmental engineering at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. “Meteotsunamis are a new generation mechanism for rip currents.”
Wu explains that rip currents formed by the one-time wave of a meteotsunami can last for hours afterward. Beachgoers need to be cautious even after a storm passes. “Please do not go back to the beach because that’s the most dangerous time. The water might look calm, but underneath, there’s a hidden danger,” Wu says.
Eric Anderson, a physical oceanographer with the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s (NOAA) Great Lakes Environment Research Laboratory, is a member of the research team. The team was headed by Wu’s PhD student Alvaro Linares. “It wasn’t explained before exactly what happened that day to connect all these different swimmers together into one event,” Anderson says. “People maybe weren’t even aware that a storm had passed a couple of hours earlier, and they decided to go to the beach because things had cleared up. They went in the water and this caught them off guard. When you see clear skies and calm conditions, you don’t expect dangerous conditions on the shoreline.
“In this paper, we see how a relatively small wave height of the meteotsunami translates into dangerous currents. It comes from the wavelength being so long. The wave may be short but when it’s a kilometer long, that’s a lot of water that comes to the shore and then retreats back over a few minutes. When that much water moves that fast, you get some dangerous currents,” Anderson says. The water pushed by the wave escaped the shore by forming rip current channels.
To document the meteo-rip formation, Linares, who recently graduated from UW-Madison and is now working for a consulting company in the United Kingdom, performed feats of forensic computing. Through powerful hydrodynamic modeling, he was able to reveal what was happening on the beaches at the time of the 2003 incidents, going from a grid scale of several kilometers down to one meter. He also used eyewitness reports of the events.
The National Weather Service (NWS) currently issues beach hazard statements, which include conditions for rip currents but not for meteotsunamis. This journal article has forecasters considering how to include this new type of hazard.
“As an operational forecaster for the National Weather Service, my thought is, how can I put this into action with a warning for people before the event?” says Robert Dukesherer, a senior forecaster for the NWS in Grand Rapids, Michigan. “Meteotsunami-induced rip currents are something that will require an education effort and then we’re going to need data in real-time to try to be able to forecast them while they’re going on.”
Megan Dodson, a NWS meteorologist in northern Indiana, says this study, “Gives us the green light to say, ‘Yeah, we’re pretty confident that meteotsunamis impact current development and we should issue a warning.’”
The 2003 events sparked Dodson’s passion for studying rip currents. Both she and Dukesherer are involved in the Great Lakes Water Safety Consortium, which works to make people aware of rip currents and other beach hazards. She finds the study’s results validating.
“We didn’t even think rip currents could happen on the Great Lakes until the late 1990s,” Dodson says. “It was the subject of debate all the way through the early 2000s. Even after we started doing the forecast warnings, not everybody was totally convinced that it was rip currents. A lot of people were saying it was just waves. So this study scientifically supports speculation of rip currents in the Great Lakes. Now we know there was something else going on.”
Wu says public education is also needed on the topic. “I believe that everyone should talk to their parents, to their people, about this,” he says. “After a storm is the time we should pay great attention for rip currents. The highest risk occurs when people pay no attention.”
Statistics from 2018 attest to the need for education about water safety. With 117 drownings, last summer was the deadliest on record for the Great Lakes, according to the Great Lakes Surf Rescue Project.
Anderson thinks public understanding of meteotsunamis has progressed, but still faces challenges. “A lot of people picture those big tsunami waves from a Hollywood movie, and that’s not what these things look like,” he says.
Dukesherer says many people mistake meteotsunamis for seiches. “They’re two very distinct things. A seiche is a sloshing in a bathtub that is rhythmic. There’s a rise and fall on each end. A meteotsunami is if you put your hand in a bathtub and just rammed it from one side to the other,” Dukesherer says.
Other members of the research team included Adam Bechle with Wisconsin Sea Grant and David Kristovich with the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
This project was supported in part by the NOAA Coastal Storms Program, Wisconsin Sea Grant, the Cooperative Institute for Great Lakes Research, the National Science Foundation’s Graduate Research Fellowship Program, the Wisconsin Coastal Management Program, NOAA Great Lakes Environmental Research Lab and the Illinois State Water Survey-University of Illinois.
Author: Marie Zhuikov