* ZeroG team finds spray cooling works in space
* Grad student meets Nobel laureates
Rachel Slaybaugh (third from left) at a luncheon in Landau, Germany, attended by Nobel Laureate Peter Grünberg (physics, 2007). (View larger image)
Grad student meets Nobel laureates
octoral student Rachel Slaybaugh never dreamed she’d have the opportunity to chat with a Nobel Prize-winning physicist—much less several of them.Yet, from June 29 through July 4, Slaybaugh joined nearly 500 young researchers from 60 countries at the Lindau Nobel Laureate Meeting in Lindau, Germany. The annual event draws 25 Nobel laureates for lectures, panel and roundtable discussions, and social and networking events.
Led by Assistant Professor Paul Wilson, Slaybaugh’s research group nominated her to attend the meeting. The selection process included application screenings at the university, national and international levels. The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is sponsoring Slaybaugh, who, coincidentally, is in Germany to conduct PhD-related research at Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe, a research lab in Karlsruhe.
Slaybaugh, who also is pursuing a PhD minor in energy analysis and policy, is studying the total statistical error present in computer simulations of nuclear systems. Her research is funded by the DOE Office of Fusion Energy Sciences through the UW Fusion Technology Institute.
How, generally, was each day of the meeting structured?
Each morning, beginning at 9 a.m., we had three 30-minute lectures from different laureates. Then we had a 15-minute coffee break and usually three more 30-minute lectures. The speakers tended to be at least loosely grouped by topic. On one day there was a panel on climate change and energy during the second portion of the morning. Next we had about two hours for lunch.
Every day the United States had a lunch arranged with other countries that some of the U.S. students could attend. For example, I got to go to lunch with the Chinese delegation and my roommates got to go with India. In the afternoon there was a two-hour discussion session with the laureates. Each person who had spoken in the morning had a discussion section and we got to choose which one we wanted to go to.
Some evenings we had events and some nights we were free. There was dinner and a dance on the first night, the United States hosted dinner with some laureates on the second night, there was a symphony on the third night, and a traditional Bavarian get together on the fourth night.
Talk about your one-on-one time with the laureates. What did you ask, and what did you take away from each conversation?
There was a chance to talk with the laureates every day in the discussion sessions. I attended William Phillips (physics, 1997), Robert Richardson (physics, 1996), Martinus Veltman (physics, 1999), and Douglas Osheroff (physics, 1996). I asked Richardson about why he liked to teach introductory physics courses and I made some comments about nuclear power (it was a big topic after the energy panel) during the Osheroff discussion. I also got to eat lunch with Peter Grünberg (physics, 2007). He told us about what he discovered and I told him a bit about helium-3 fusion. We also discussed some general stuff about traveling and winning the nobel prize. From many of these discussions I got the feeling that even the Nobel Prize winners are “regular” people, and so they were more approachable for this reason.
Most of the laureates focused on key steps and traits and outlooks that enabled them to do the wonderful research they did, so this was most of what I took away. They focused a good deal on looking closely at what appears to be failure, keeping an open mind, and on working hard but being able to take a step back to get some perspective. I also learned some things about physics I didn’t know before. It was great to see what is on the cutting edge in so many different parts of the field.
How will the technical portions of the meeting benefit you as a researcher and engineer?
The biggest benefit was thinking about the overall approach to research. None of the laureates at the meeting really do anything related to what I do, so it was the information about the “how” that was most helpful for my research.
What did you enjoy most about the meeting, and why?
I think I enjoyed the discussion sessions the most because we really had a chance to ask a lot of things—both technical and non-technical questions. The laureates really seemed to enjoy talking with us and sharing their perspective and expertise.
You had the opportunity to meet many peers from around the world. How do you plan to continue those relationships?
I made many contacts from around the United States as well as from around the world. I think that I will keep in touch with some of these new contacts. The Internet is an amazing place: We already have made Facebook groups to share thoughts and photos from the meeting. E-mail makes keeping in touch much easier. … It’s pretty neat for me because I wouldn’t have met any of these people otherwise, as they are not in my field. I really think it helps to communicate with other disciplines sometimes so you know what is going on in other parts of science and you can see what challenges other people are facing.
Is there anything else you’d like to add?
I’d like to express my thanks to my sponsors (the U.S. Department of Energy) for the experience and recommend that they keep sending students in the future. It was an amazing experience.