College of Engineering University of Wisconsin-Madison
Decorative header to link to Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering

Graphic of the CEE newsletter The Fountain
THE CONDUIT : The Civil & Environmental Engineering Department Newsletter

 

THE CONDUIT
Spring-Summer 2005

Featured articles

Crash data may shape safety policy

Solid knowledge:
Prions may stick
in soil or sludge

Visiting Committee
steps up to support CEE

Learning long distance

Pictures in time:
Study tracks
Lake Superior erosion

Scholarship recipients
2004-2005

CEE Department PROFILE


Regular Features

Message from the chair

In Memoriam

Student profile:
Linda Vanevenhoven

 

 

 

spacer Homepage for CEE newsletter Button to obtain BACK ISSUES Button to CONTACT US Button to JOIN OUR MAILING LIST Button that connects to UW Foundation page for online giving  
 

Learning long distance

A view of Nick Crompton's group project

A view of Nick Crompton's group project
(15K JPG)

Decorative initial cap Here’s a tall order: Assemble a team of architects, engineers and construction managers spread not only across the country, but across the globe. In four months’ time, design a 30,000-square-foot general-purpose engineering building using sustainable materials and practices. Include space for early move-in rooms and site the structure atop either a square or an L-shaped footprint. Spend no more than $5.5 million, but wait to build until 2015.

It’s a challenge four UW-Madison students met this spring, when they participated in a unique distance-learning course based at Stanford University. “The whole goal of the course is to facilitate a working relationship between an architect, an engineer and a construction manager,” says Justin Schmidt, who graduated this May with a bachelor’s degree in the department’s construction engineering and management program.

The students—Schmidt, undergraduates Nick Crompton and Pete Dering, and master’s candidate Scott Markowski—are members of separate teams that included students from Stanford, Georgia Institute of Technology, Bauhaus University, Germany; KTH (Royal Institute of Technology), Sweden; and the University of Manchester, England.

Another view of Nick Crompton's group project

Another view of Nick Crompton's group project
(13K JPG)

In January, they briefly met all of the members of their class at Stanford. Then for the rest of the semester, each group used technologies such as teleconferencing, Internet meeting software and Internet telephony to hold formal meetings at least once a week. At other times, team members communicated via instant messages or by posting comments and documents to an online course bulletin board. Additionally, they “attended” a four-hour course lecture from 2 p.m. to 6 p.m. central time on Fridays. “It’s not as bad for us,” says Schmidt, “but if you take into account that Europe has to be in it, they’re doing it from 9 p.m. to 1 a.m.”

Schmidt’s group designed a building for the fictitious engineering school of Express University in the New Mexico desert. “So along with just building the building, another job is to make it fit within its environment,” he says.

Not only did his team have to take into account a protected cactus grove adjacent to its site, orienting the building’s views toward the grove, yet protecting it from construction spillover, but members also chose to use adobe as a primary building material. “None of us has ever worked with adobe,” Schmidt says. “So that’s a learning process we went through—figuring out how adobe works and how much it even costs to make.”

Crompton’s building, which is set to be constructed in Los Angeles, is glass and concrete. Among his group’s concerns were temperature and wind considerations, while another team had to worry about cold, frost lines, snow and the timeline for enclosing its building. A few of the teams also had to consider the potential for earthquakes.

Initially, says Crompton, the architects in the group carried most of the workload. They developed the building’s concept, while the engineers (like Markowski) ensured their design would be structurally sound and cost-effective and would incorporate the right materials. As construction managers, he, Schmidt and Dering “built” their group’s designs, using a 4-D model, with the fourth dimension being time. The result is a time-lapse “video” of how construction progresses.

While each team experienced challenges—most notably, the difficulty of interacting with group members without meeting face to face—overall, says Schmidt, the course was an excellent experience.

“You get to see how people in other disciplines think, instead of just working with other construction management people or other structural people,” he says. “You can see what the architect was thinking about when he was designing the building and what the engineer was thinking about when he was looking at it. Knowing their thought processes to get to their design—it kind of helps you learn more about the building, how it’s going up and why it should be built that way. It gives you a better understanding of how buildings are built.”

 



For help with this webpage: webmaster@engr.wisc.edu.

Copyright 2005 The Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System

Date last modified: Monday, 6-June-2005 15:43:00 CDT
Date created: 6-June-2005

spacer

 

Graphic of the ECE newsletter